This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Marketing

A bit of data which remembers the affiliate who forwarded a user to our site and recognises orders from those who become customers through that affiliate.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

 

New Zealand Airbnb Decision Great News for Landlords

By 2 min read • May 23, 2018

The rise of property letting websites like Airbnb has been both a blessing and curse for landlords. One the one hand, letting out properties via Airbnb is both easy and profitable. If you own a property in a popular tourist destination, you will make more money with short-term lets than you would looking for a long-term tenant. On the other hand, there have been numerous stories of properties being trashed by tenants who have thrown parties. Landlords who don’t use Airbnb have also had problems with tenants who have signed a long-term lease and then illegally sub-let the property to make a profit.

Tenancy Tribunal Decision

A recent tribunal decision in Wellington, New Zealand, could pave the way for landlords to recover money from tenants who illegally sub-let properties on short-term letting website, Airbnb. The tenant in question did not have permission from the landlord to sub-let the property, but he had made more than $12k letting out the apartment on at least 54 separate occasions.

Breach of Tenancy Agreement

When the landlord contacted the tenant to complain, the tenant ceased paying the rent, fitted a deadbolt on the door, and left. The landlord took his case to a Tenancy Tribunal and his solicitor argued that it was unlawful for a tenant to profit by breaching his tenancy agreement.

The tribunal ruled he could recover the profits from the sub-leasing activity. This is an important decision because it sets a precedent. There is now a legal basis for landlords to recover profits from illegal sub-letting activities.

Was this post useful?
0/600
Awesome!
Thanks so much for your feedback!
Got it!
Thanks for your feedback.
Share with friends:
Copied
Popular articles

Get the best of Landlord Insider
delivered to your inbox fortnightly

Sign up and we’ll send you our latest posts, tax tips, legal tips, software tips and compliance deadlines, everything you need to know every two weeks. Unsubscribe any time.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.